Nymphet (Kodomo no Jikan) Cancelled aka. You Blew It Up!

Oh yeah, hardcore loli-rape here.
Well, it’s official now. Seven Seas has cancelled its planned release of Kodomo no Jikan, also known as Nymphet. I am sorely dissapointed in Seven Seas for doing this and basically bowing down to the uneducated horde. Whatever unintended consequences this will have are unknown at the moment, whether it be a general sensitivity on licensor’s part to controversial material or greater feedback from a more mainstream fanbase. One factor that this has highlighted, though, is very disturbing to me: otaku, here referring to all manga and anime fans in general, are deathly scared of the more undesireable parts of the fandom being found out by the mainstream. Like “fear of being accused as a witch and burned at the stake” scared. I’ll talk about that a bit later after I talk about the issue of KnJ being cancelled.
I blame two people mostly for this cancellation: Jason Deangelis, president of Seven Seas, and Zac Bertschy, Mr. Answerman for ANN. Jason Deangelis showed several mishandlings in his license of KnJ. While I firmly believe its licensing was not a mistake, I’ll admit it is a niche title that needs special handling. Titling it Nymphet, essentially conjuring up images of a Humbert Humbert-esque American pedophile, is not the kind of handling I was thinking about. Then trying to market this to a bookstore mainstream was pretty bad. My local stores don’t even carry Strawberry Marshmallow, and he expects them to carry something called Nymphet? Obviously this would of been bettered handled as more of an internet-only item. While its range would be limited, it would most likely become a moderate success among the hardcore market and niche groups. This is the route KnJ probably would of taken, if it wasn’t for Zac Bertschy’s wonderful “insight.”
Zac Bertschy decided, of his own accord based on various summaries and not the original material, that KnJ was clearly the work of the devil and not fit for publication, viewing anyone who would have bought it as instant pedophiles. This would of been fine, since every man is entitled to his own opinions, except Zac runs a highly popular and read column on a popular site, which, journalistic integrity usually says, means he would check the facts before deriding any work. Except, he didn’t, so secure in his own beliefs that any work that featured a little girl in slightly sexual situations must be lolicon at its greatest. And because he has a well known column, many people followed his beliefs, leading to the situation we have now. The almighty “fanbase” has spoken, even though the true audience for KnJ who would have bought the book and wished to read it were silenced. Blame Deangelis for not having the balls to stand up and defend his own company. So Deangelis gathered the wood and Bertschy set the fire, but what about the fans in all of this?
If anything, this shows in my eyes that the majority of the fanbase is scared; scared of the darker genres (lolicon, shota, yaoi, yuri, etc.) from coming to light, mainly mainstream light. “Far be it from being tortured for liking Naruto, what will happen if all manga becomes associated with pedophilia?” is probably the general idea most people who hated the book are thinking of. The thing is, there’s already plenty of stuff the mainstream could incriminate the fanbase with. Just think of all those yaoi titles. Where was the fan outcry then? Perhaps we should all be thankful the day hasn’t come yet when otaku are held under critical mainstream light, but that doesn’t mean we should live in fear of it. Anime was mostly seen at porn, but that viewpoint has changed. I fear the day when only “safe” titles are licensed, decided by a complacent majority who like things uncontroversial, meanwhile stifling a niche of more creative and darker interests.
What is all comes down to is, what happens when a niche group has interests the majority disapproves of? Here, the majority has spoken in harsh tones. Otakudom has grown to the point where there is no longer a collective one, but instead a myriad of interests fighting against each other for publisher attention. All we, who lie in that niche, can hope for is a braver publisher to stand up and support niches with new titles, something Seven Seas doesn’t seem to be able to do. Vertical and Dark Horse seem more deserving of support in this, I think, though they’ve hardly published anything as controversial as KnJ. This is probably just the first in a series of battles between the mainstream and niche anime worlds, between marketability and intellectual and creative freedom. Let’s hope people are more open for the next one.
Oh, and Seven Seas, WHERE’S THAT NOVEL LINE YOU’VE BEEN PROMISING FOR ALMOST TWO DAMN YEARS?! Just had to get my Seven Seas hate out.
From AnimeOnDVD:
Nymphet Nailed (07:36 AM EDT): The swirl of controversy is abound these days. Initially, Anime News Network had an artcile by Jason DeAngelis in which he talked about the “controversial” title Nymphet that they were soliciting for manga release. In order to deal with some of the debate, they put the book on hold. Word has now come from ICv2 that DeAngelis has canceled the book outright and will not be releasing it and stating “”…it’s not appropriate for Seven Seas to publish Nymphet[.]”
Coming at the same time is apparently a new attack on civil liberties as LiveJournal is removing a large number of communities and journals related to taboo subjects as well as advising users who have Interests such as yaoi, rape, and shouta, or the names of shows and books sometimes associated with such terms to remove them as quickly as possible which implies that their accounts could be removed as well. An online “vigilante” group apparently declared war on LiveJournal last week over such interests and LiveJournal’s corporate legal side. As of this writing nobody has full confirmed who is involved with this sudden rash of removals but JournelFen has a large amount of reading material on the subject.
Comment on May 30, 2007 @ 5:41 pm
To be fair to the president, it wasn’t Seven Seas’s choice of title. For some reason or another, the original creator wanted that title. Sure, he could have refused, but that would be pretty rude to the creator.
(I actually preferred the original title, though. I wish the mangaka didn’t want the name change.)
Comment on May 30, 2007 @ 6:27 pm
That is curious. Did the creator understand that full connotations of that word, or was it just another bit of engrish in play? Seems like this manga really was doomed from the start.
Comment on May 30, 2007 @ 7:12 pm
Y’know, I’m not really sure. I was talking about the name change on my blog when some poster told me that.
Comment on May 30, 2007 @ 8:51 pm
I’d imagine if the author requested that to be the title, he probably had a pretty good idea what it meant.
Oh, and for the record, the thing about the name change coming from the author came from a forum post by a Seven Seas rep months ago.
Comment on May 30, 2007 @ 10:14 pm
Maybe “Kodomo no Jikan” has this pun that gives it the same meaning as “Nymphet”, but I could be wrong.
Comment on May 31, 2007 @ 3:27 am
“Somehow typical american” that’s what I first thought after reading the article. America, the land of censoring at its best, the land where pedophiles are put on public lists to be killed by some “avengers” later.
Irnoy? Well, that’s what you always here in staid news in Germany when it comes to such topics regarding America. So all in all I think that THIS is the reason why KnJ has been canceled. Sorry if I’m offending some of you, just wanted to say it from the German point of view.
And now’s the question where the censormania will go next..
Comment on May 31, 2007 @ 5:58 am
Kodomo no Jikan means something akin to “Age of Innocence,” or so I’ve read. Take from it as you will.
Comment on May 31, 2007 @ 12:25 pm
Not going to weigh in with any thoughts, but I believe that Kodomo no Jikan would literally translate to something like Child’s Time (kodomo=child/children, jikan=time).
Comment on May 31, 2007 @ 3:49 pm
‘Kodomo no Jikan’ literally means “child’s time”, but it is used metaphorically to mean, approximately, “age of innocence”. In this context, it is clearly ironic, since the innocent is the 23-yr-old *virgin* male teacher.
By the way, the mangaka, Watashiya Kaworu, is female.
Comment on June 5, 2007 @ 12:43 am
Just wanted to chip in the creator isn’t a male. It’s a female from what I’ve read about that person. They understand what the title means and wanted it to stay that way for one reason or another. Either way it’s sad that America fails so hard….
Comment on September 2, 2007 @ 12:13 pm
[...] But no other non-blogger raises the amount of pure emotion (either for or against) in the Otakusphere as one man: [...]
Pingback on March 29, 2008 @ 2:44 am